NiTROACTiVE Posted January 6, 2016 So North Korea has claimed a hydrogen bomb test. As we should all know, North Korea has been planning nukes and bombs like this for years, and they were willing to use them on their enemies such as the USA. If they manage to make more of these, then we might be in big trouble. Here's an article on this with more information: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/06/asia/north-korea-hydrogen-bomb-test/ 0 Share this post Link to post
Zed Posted January 6, 2016 NiTROACTiVE said:If they manage to make more of these, then we might be in big trouble. I think it's more likely they will be in big trouble. 0 Share this post Link to post
Quast Posted January 6, 2016 Juche rocketry technology is still very 1950s. They have no ICBM delivery system to threaten the united states and the rockets they do have are certainly not powerful enough to carry a nuclear warhead so as to be able to even threaten south korea or japan. If they somehow did, they still wouldn't use it for a multitude of obvious reasons. Also, they did not test an h-bomb. They did not send a man to the sun. The birds and mountains and flowers or whatever bullshit did not sing songs when kim jong il was born. 0 Share this post Link to post
Tiger Posted January 6, 2016 Quast said:Also, they did not test an h-bomb. They did not send a man to the sun. The birds and mountains and flowers or whatever bullshit did not sing songs when kim jong il was born. How dare you insult our humble and glorious leader! They indeed did send a man to the sun - and walked on that sun but yet was still able to come right back to Pyongyang in less than 24 hours! I hope you wash your mouth out with soap, sunny jim! 0 Share this post Link to post
Doomkid Posted January 6, 2016 Related thread from about a month back, just for reference / discussion: https://www.doomworld.com/vb/everything-else/85008-n-korea-has-declared-that-they-now-has-a-hydrogen-bomb/ 0 Share this post Link to post
Wereknight Posted January 6, 2016 Quast said:Juche rocketry technology is still very 1950s. They have no ICBM delivery system to threaten the united states and the rockets they do have are certainly not powerful enough to carry a nuclear warhead so as to be able to even threaten south korea or japan. If they somehow did, they still wouldn't use it for a multitude of obvious reasons. Also, they did not test an h-bomb. They did not send a man to the sun. The birds and mountains and flowers or whatever bullshit did not sing songs when kim jong il was born. Buuuuuut some of them have a ton of shit in head for bombing near neighbors... well, bad sign, another result of what I calling "God-ish Evil Plan". No really, all of it seems strange as fuck. No? 0 Share this post Link to post
Gez Posted January 6, 2016 The test was successful in that they have successfully conducted a test in which it was successfully demonstrated that their bomb didn't work. 0 Share this post Link to post
HorrorMovieRei Posted January 7, 2016 NiTROACTiVE said:If they manage to make more of these, then we might be in big trouble. That's exactly what they want, they want people to fear them. In reality, if they nuked anyone, the backlash would be swift and brutal. Their technology is nothing compared to the one found in most developed countries, nobody would side with them, and their leader looks like a school shooter. 0 Share this post Link to post
RestlessRodent Posted January 7, 2016 If they try launching something, China will probably shoot down the missile. China is essentially North Korea's lifeline, and they would not want to piss them off. 0 Share this post Link to post
GreyGhost Posted January 7, 2016 Gez said:The test was successful in that they have successfully conducted a test in which it was successfully demonstrated that their bomb didn't work. Agreed. With an estimated yield of less than 10 kilotons it's a bit small for a H-bomb, possibly just the atomic trigger for a conventional two-stage thermonuclear device. Which would make this a failed test. 0 Share this post Link to post
DooM_RO Posted January 7, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PblG_PtUGQI 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 7, 2016 This combined with all of the other current events, really make me wonder if we are on the eve of World War III. 0 Share this post Link to post
Mithran Denizen Posted January 7, 2016 Donald Trump for war president. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 7, 2016 Mithran Denizen said:Donald Trump for war president. Hey, at least it won't be against Russia. 0 Share this post Link to post
Clonehunter Posted January 8, 2016 We should settle our wars by pitting our nations' leaders against each other in boxing matches. 0 Share this post Link to post
Skullguy Posted January 8, 2016 We should settle our wars by pitting our nations' leaders against each other in boxing matches. We should of elected Bruce lee,Mike Tyson or Muhammad ali in their primes if that was a real thing. I wonder how they would have changed this country if they were elected. 0 Share this post Link to post
Doominator2 Posted January 8, 2016 Kontra Kommando said:Hey, at least it won't be against Russia. Apparently Putin is all for Donald Trump being president (a stupid president is easy to manipulate ya know) 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 8, 2016 Doominator2 said:(a stupid president is easy to manipulate ya know) Yea, that's why Hilary or Bernie must never become president. We'll be most malleable and weak under their guidance. They already kowtow to the inane interests of their regressive fringe-left. They will never be fit to lead this nation. EDIT: Lets not derail this thread with this political verbal war of attrition. The election is 11 months away; let's all just wait and see. 0 Share this post Link to post
dew Posted January 8, 2016 Then why are you derailing it? You sneak in a VOTE FOR DOLAN BEST MURCAN PRESIDENT YEEHAAW message and only then it's back to thread topic? Weak troll, C- at best. The rest of the free world stands behind whoever's against Trump even if it is Clint Eastwood's empty chair. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 8, 2016 dew said:Then why are you derailing it? You sneak in a VOTE FOR DOLAN BEST MURCAN PRESIDENT YEEHAAW message and only then it's back to thread topic? Weak troll, C- at best. The rest of the free world stands behind whoever's against Trump even if it is Clint Eastwood's empty chair. No, because I know its impossible to debate with people like you. Because all you do is exactly what you just posted above. Nice provocation, but I'm not taking the bait. Besides, I didn't even start this discussion. Mithran Denizen said:Donald Trump for war president. How can the quoted statement below, be considered to initiate trolling? Kontra Kommando said:This combined with all of the other current events, really make me wonder if we are on the eve of World War III. I guess if you're intolerant of someone's views, you can find all kinds of ways to antagonize them. You don't see me looking for people to provoke on here, because they want to elect a far left candidate. But because cowards find courage in numbers, they know they won't be inundated with a flood ad hominems. Why don't you guys go to a place outside of the bubble, and you can see how much people appreciate what you have to say. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/31/upshot/donald-trumps-strongest-supporters-a-certain-kind-of-democrat.html?_r=0 Also, its not such a YEEHAW message. Turns out his biggest supporters are former-democrats from the north east. These are the generations of people that supported the democrats when they championed unionism. They supported democrats for economic reasons. They never cared about all of the other stuff the democrats stand for. 0 Share this post Link to post
dew Posted January 8, 2016 You didn't start it, yet you felt obligated to end it, but only after you'd chipped your opinion in. Either join the flames or cry for peace, but doing both at once is just about the most infuriating option. With the possible exception of replacing all your posts by high res porn. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 8, 2016 dew said:You didn't start it, yet you felt obligated to end it, but only after you'd chipped your opinion in. Either join the flames or cry for peace, but doing both at once is just about the most infuriating option. With the possible exception of replacing all your posts by high res porn. Wrong. I said at least if he was the president he wouldn't go to war with Russia. Then someone said he was stupid, so I said that the other candidates were weak and malleable. At that point, little discussion can be yielded. 1 against 4, its obvious why you would want to continue the discussion. At least I've been steadfast on my own. No mob mentality is going to persuade me, or shame me into submission. 0 Share this post Link to post
BaronOfStuff Posted January 8, 2016 Fuck whatever you babies are arguing about, back on topic this announcement/warning from Fatty Kim is the greatest opening joke for any year in living memory. 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted January 8, 2016 Kontra Kommando said:Then someone said he was stupid, so I said that the other candidates were weak and malleable. Tip for you and other bidding neo reactionaries: The 'well you said my options where dumb and that made me feel bad so who's the REAL bigot huh?' routine would work better if you didn't also keep saying stuff a pulp serial villain would say.Kontra Kommando said:No mob mentality is going to persuade me, or shame me into submission. Yeah I know. Shame only works if you have an ounce of self awareness. 0 Share this post Link to post
Kontra Kommando Posted January 8, 2016 Captain Red said:Tip for you and other bidding neo reactionaries: The 'well you said my options where dumb and that made me feel bad so who's the REAL bigot huh?' routine would work better if you didn't also keep saying stuff a pulp serial villain would say. Yeah I know. Shame only works if you have an ounce of self awareness. You have added nothing but sarcasm. You're only proving me right. I don't label myself neo-reactionary; I'm an individual private citizen. Are you a communist? I guess all of those former-democrats in the Northeast are neo-reactionaries too, huh? 1 vs 5 BaronOfStuff said:Fuck whatever you babies are arguing about, back on topic this announcement/warning from Fatty Kim is the greatest opening joke for any year in living memory. That's what I'm vying for. 5 people made this about something else. When I tried to end it, it was only galvanized by someone with the supposed ethical responsibility to defuse these kind of situations. Maybe its because this isn't the speed demo boards. 0 Share this post Link to post
Captain Red Posted January 8, 2016 Hey guys I would like to point out that Kontra Kommando who just wants to move on from all this politics has edited his reply to my post about 5 times. 0 Share this post Link to post
Linguica Posted January 8, 2016 If North Korea actually built a functioning hydrogen bomb I will eat my hat 0 Share this post Link to post