Why don't I have a custom title by now!?
I am sorry, but to be honest, I can no longer be so easily convinced to respect a prominent quality of a dadaistic piece of work. My default opinion is "total randomness = nothing specially awesome", and you'd need to provide very strong arguments to disprove this for your particular work, which you didn't. The arguments can't be just "there's even more total randomness".
I am not really complaining, though, and if I sounded like if I was complaining, I apologize. Your work is very interesting at least (but also "at best"). I just don't see the charm of randomness as an art that can anyhow overcome the "true" art. Therefore I say: Nice, mind-blowing, interesting, a bit funny, I smiled. But I just don't understand people who can go so far to say: "The best ever, top quality, award winning".
You did and are doing a good job, I like your results, allowing me to completely separate off my known reality for a couple moments. I'll never enjoy randomness for more than a couple moments though. I hope you understand this. That said, I can't really criticize any part of your work in particular, because my judgement comes from the principle itself.
Thank you for what kind of stuff you're doing, jack101!