Reaper Grimm
Register | User Profile | Member List | F.A.Q | Privacy Policy | New Blog | Search Forums | Forums Home
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > Any thoughts on Libertarians?
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »  
Author
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Bucket
ROCK & LOAD
COCK BEEN BLOWED
IN YOUR MOUTH,
MANJUICE EXPLOAD


Posts: 4989
Registered: 01-04


But the free markets and courts will take care of that. After a few thousand people die of poisoned food, no one will buy those products again.

Old Post 05-04-13 18:19 #
Bucket is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Feniks
Mini-Member


Posts: 84
Registered: 08-12


Most libertarians I've met come from a privileged background and just worship their ideology because it benefits or would benefit them. For example, their ideas of meritocracy are usually cheap excuses because most people aren't rewarded for their merit, abilities or whatsoever. Deceit and manipulation account for much more in real life.

I'm afraid a lot of libertarians are heartless to the core.

Another thing is that free market is said to be customer-oriented, but at the same time the quality of goods has become substandard over the years. More and more companies decide to manufacture in cheap labour countries in order to cut costs at the expense of quality.

Old Post 05-04-13 19:40 #
Feniks is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Kontra Kommando
Let's attack aggressively


Posts: 1441
Registered: 02-13



Feniks said:

Another thing is that free market is said to be customer-oriented, but at the same time the quality of goods has become substandard over the years. More and more companies decide to manufacture in cheap labour countries in order to cut costs at the expense of quality.



However, within our lifetime, there will surely be robotic replacements for cheap labor. I wonder what will happen once the pools of workers within those oppressive countries will do once they are unemployed. I could imagine it would spark a lot of unrest within their countries, and perhaps force a paradigm shift within them. In the best case scenario, they'll find their living conditions to be too intolerable, and provoke factions who are sympathetic to their concerns to facilitate change.

Old Post 05-04-13 19:48 #
Kontra Kommando is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
dew
experts


Posts: 3618
Registered: 05-08


Economic Left/Right: -6.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.21

for some reason i moved even further left, heh.

Old Post 05-04-13 19:55 #
dew is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hardcore_gamer
Fáviti Member


Posts: 2374
Registered: 03-07



Feniks said:
their ideas of meritocracy are usually cheap excuses because most people aren't rewarded for their merit, abilities or whatsoever. Deceit and manipulation account for much more in real life.


Care to back this up with arguments? Because whenever I hear someone claim that people aren't rewarded for their effort the first thing that comes to mind are butthurt people who are simply angry because they weren't as successful as they had hoped they would be.


Feniks said:

Another thing is that free market is said to be customer-oriented, but at the same time the quality of goods has become substandard over the years. More and more companies decide to manufacture in cheap labour countries in order to cut costs at the expense of quality.



A cheaper but a ok product can be better then a very good but a very expensive product. What "quality" means is very subjective.

If product A is better then product B, but costs 10x more then its hard to make the case that product A is better then B.

Old Post 05-04-13 21:18 #
hardcore_gamer is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Feniks
Mini-Member


Posts: 84
Registered: 08-12



hardcore_gamer said:
Care to back this up with arguments? Because whenever I hear someone claim that people aren't rewarded for their effort the first thing that comes to mind are butthurt people who are simply angry because they weren't as successful as they had hoped they would be.
I'm not going to expound on this, but I hope you don't believe everybody has an equal chance from the very start. Depending on your background, you might receive an Ivy League education or just die of hunger at the ripe age of 3... In this case, it wouldn't really matter how smart you are. That's just an example.

Then, plenty of people have finished universities only to become perpetually unemployed. Plenty of people have set up their businesses that failed. Tell me that they didn't put in any effort, and that fucking chinless wonders did.

Anyway, manipulative smooth-talkers tend to be pretty successful in their lives, and the question is, do they really deserve it? I don't think so.

Old Post 05-04-13 21:31 #
Feniks is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Snakes
Senior Member


Posts: 2396
Registered: 09-09


Here we are once again:

Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.44

Boy, I just keep on drifting further and further away from that center point. I blame the NDAA for a lot of that.

Old Post 05-04-13 21:33 #
Snakes is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Gez
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 11232
Registered: 07-07



hardcore_gamer said:
Care to back this up with arguments? Because whenever I hear someone claim that people aren't rewarded for their effort the first thing that comes to mind are butthurt people who are simply angry because they weren't as successful as they had hoped they would be.

Right. Well, let's take some examples.

Samuel Robson Walton has a net worth of 21 billion according to Forbes. (In passing, I just love how that is phrased. "He has a net worth." His money is his worth, his measure as a human being.)

Now, I don't have detailed Forbes statistics, but I'm pretty sure that if you add the net worths of all of these people who are still living today, I strongly doubt you'd approach even one single billion.

Obviously, this means that one single heir has more merit than all the Nobel-prized scientists out there.

Old Post 05-04-13 21:51 #
Gez is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
dew
experts


Posts: 3618
Registered: 05-08



hardcore_gamer said:
A cheaper but a ok product can be better then a very good but a very expensive product. What "quality" means is very subjective.

If product A is better then product B, but costs 10x more then its hard to make the case that product A is better then B.


"quality" can be subjective as far as weight of qualitiative factors goes, but cost is not one of them. you claim that the cost of the product lowers its quality, which is obviously wrong. to twist the common antimarxist example, it'd mean that a mudpie with no value would be a better product than a very expensive muffin and it only depends on how much "very expensive" is for different people.

Old Post 05-04-13 21:57 #
dew is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Aliotroph?
postCount++


Posts: 2666
Registered: 03-02


I think they changed the questions. I used to show up closer to the Dalai Lama on there because he used to be further down and left on the graph. I don't think his opinions or mine have changed very much.

Anyway...
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.67

Whenever I do the elections compass thing put up by the CBC I always score near our left-leaning parties (way more left than Obama could ever be), and yet those show up as far more authoritarian than I appear on the regular compass.

Conclusion: this thing is as useless as those IQ tests you can do online.

Old Post 05-04-13 22:02 #
Aliotroph? is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
TheCupboard
Forum Regular


Posts: 936
Registered: 02-06


They have more balls than hypocritical Republicans who speak magniloquently of "gettin the gov'munt outta our lifes" except when it comes to their pet issues: counterterror, abortion, marriage, drugs, military intervention, etc. Even if Libertarianism is doomed as an ideology, at least its followers can be consistent.

Old Post 05-05-13 11:12 #
TheCupboard is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3873
Registered: 04-04


Should anyone care to know.

It's about the same as last time, think.

Old Post 05-05-13 12:08 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
GreyGhost
Why don't I have a custom title by now?!


Posts: 8768
Registered: 01-08



Kontra Kommando said:
However, within our lifetime, there will surely be robotic replacements for cheap labor. I wonder what will happen once the pools of workers within those oppressive countries will do once they are unemployed. I could imagine it would spark a lot of unrest within their countries, and perhaps force a paradigm shift within them. In the best case scenario, they'll find their living conditions to be too intolerable, and provoke factions who are sympathetic to their concerns to facilitate change.
No doubt there will be, though industrial robots aren't cheap, neither are the skilled workers required to program and maintain them. So I expect fully automated factories to appear in developed countries first (where the cost benefits of automation are greater), as a means of revitalizing moribund manufacturing industries and competing with imports produced by cheap labour.


hardcore_gamer said:
A cheaper but a ok product can be better then a very good but a very expensive product. What "quality" means is very subjective.

If product A is better then product B, but costs 10x more then its hard to make the case that product A is better then B.

If product B is durable and reliable enough to be handed down to your grandchildren, while product A has to be replaced every other year - I'd say product B is better quality.

Old Post 05-05-13 12:24 #
GreyGhost is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
geekmarine
Senior Member


Posts: 1806
Registered: 05-00


I will have to agree that the concept of a meritocracy is fucking ridiculous. Sure, I have a job that I love and which pays the bills, and I truly believe I am being rewarded for my hard work, but I fully acknowledge that I'm only at where I am now through a lifetime of luck. Getting here was a result of many factors well outside of my control. I didn't get to pick my family, I didn't get to pick where I was educated or what kind of education I got. Sure, I picked my college, but a number of factors outside of my control could have easily prevented me from attending the college of my choice. I applied for the job, but the ultimate decision was in the hands of my employer, regardless of how well I presented myself. And finally, there are many specific positions I could have been assigned to with my current job, but I was lucky to be assigned to one that I really enjoy.

Old Post 05-05-13 13:50 #
geekmarine is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
hardcore_gamer
Fáviti Member


Posts: 2374
Registered: 03-07



geekmarine said:
I will have to agree that the concept of a meritocracy is fucking ridiculous. Sure, I have a job that I love and which pays the bills, and I truly believe I am being rewarded for my hard work, but I fully acknowledge that I'm only at where I am now through a lifetime of luck. Getting here was a result of many factors well outside of my control. I didn't get to pick my family, I didn't get to pick where I was educated or what kind of education I got. Sure, I picked my college, but a number of factors outside of my control could have easily prevented me from attending the college of my choice. I applied for the job, but the ultimate decision was in the hands of my employer, regardless of how well I presented myself. And finally, there are many specific positions I could have been assigned to with my current job, but I was lucky to be assigned to one that I really enjoy.


The problem with this argument is that it is based on a logical fallacy.

Why do you think some of the most successful people in history became successful? It wasn't because somebody gave them everything they needed, but because they used their intelligence and skill to reshape the world around them and get what they want even in spite of not always starting out with everything needed.

People who whine about it not being possible to get anything done becaue they were not given all of their chances straight into their fucking laps with no effot required on their part have no idea what merrit even means.

Old Post 05-05-13 17:04 #
hardcore_gamer is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
durian
Member


Posts: 497
Registered: 08-08



hardcore_gamer said:

The problem with this argument is that it is based on a logical fallacy.


Really? I didn't spot one, and that's kind of what I do.

But since you mentioned it...


hardcore_gamer said:

Why do you think some of the most successful people in history became successful? It wasn't because somebody gave them everything they needed, but because they used their intelligence and skill to reshape the world around them and get what they want even in spite of not always starting out with everything needed.


From the fact that some people were in position to make the most of their opportunities and achieve great success, it does not follow that all people are in a position to make the most of their opportunities and achieve great success, and so the fact that certain people haven't achieved great success while others have doesn't indicate that ones that haven't are in that situation because of their own idleness. You seem to have implicitly inferred 'all' from 'some', which is indeed a basic error of reasoning, or logical fallacy, as you say.

Old Post 05-05-13 17:50 #
durian is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Bucket
ROCK & LOAD
COCK BEEN BLOWED
IN YOUR MOUTH,
MANJUICE EXPLOAD


Posts: 4989
Registered: 01-04



hardcore_gamer said:
Why do you think some of the most successful people in history became successful? It wasn't because somebody gave them everything they needed, but because they used their intelligence and skill to reshape the world around them and get what they want even in spite of not always starting out with everything needed.

This is bunk. Half of the equation for success is impressing the right people and getting an opportunity. What you do with that opportunity is certainly a factor, but still.

Old Post 05-05-13 18:01 #
Bucket is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Creaphis
I will deliberately take a contrary position just for the sake of writing incredibly long arguments


Posts: 4181
Registered: 10-05



hardcore_gamer said:
The problem with this argument is that it is based on a logical fallacy.


Nope, yours is.

Also, read Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell to see how success stories are nearly always a story of cumulative, "unmerited" advantages.

Old Post 05-05-13 18:01 #
Creaphis is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
geekmarine
Senior Member


Posts: 1806
Registered: 05-00


I was successful because I had the skills, but I acknowledge that I also had luck. You're attacking me as if I'm complaining about my lack of success. Would I be where I am if I had been in an abusive family, or if I had been born in rural Africa? Don't think so. Your entire argument is based on the principle that things like genetics and upbringing mean absolutely nothing.

Old Post 05-05-13 18:07 #
geekmarine is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Kontra Kommando
Let's attack aggressively


Posts: 1441
Registered: 02-13



GreyGhost said:



If this thread's in the process of transmuting into "Political Compass 2013", start posting results and I'll update the graph. Haven't decided what colour to use this year.



You should do it

Old Post 05-08-13 19:22 #
Kontra Kommando is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
fraggle
Filled with the code of Doom


Posts: 7743
Registered: 07-00


Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.82

Old Post 05-08-13 19:58 #
fraggle is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
esselfortium
A Major Doomworld Concern


Posts: 6620
Registered: 01-02


Economic Left/Right: -4.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.79

Old Post 05-08-13 20:14 #
esselfortium is online now Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
kmxexii
Senior Member


Posts: 1193
Registered: 06-10


Economic Left/Right: -3.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.46

Old Post 05-08-13 20:32 #
kmxexii is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Nuxius
Forum Regular


Posts: 751
Registered: 02-05


Ah, so we're doing these again, eh?

Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56

http://politicalcompass.org/printab...=0.25&soc=-4.56


Hasn't changed much since the last time I did this, it seems. Still firmly Libertarian for social, and right in the middle for economic.

Old Post 05-09-13 05:58 #
Nuxius is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Andy Olivera
Forum Regular


Posts: 713
Registered: 12-02


Oh, why not...

Economic Left/Right: 4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.62

Old Post 05-09-13 08:28 #
Andy Olivera is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
durian
Member


Posts: 497
Registered: 08-08


Hmmm... Turns out I'm quite the hippy, most disappointing.

Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.38

The relevance of a couple of the questions was not entirely obvious, e.g., I'm not sure what a like/dislike of non-representational artwork has to do with anything.

Old Post 05-09-13 09:04 #
durian is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
DoomUK
Forum Staple


Posts: 3873
Registered: 04-04



durian said:
The relevance of a couple of the questions was not entirely obvious, e.g., I'm not sure what a like/dislike of non-representational artwork has to do with anything.

A lot of the questions also invoke the "it depends" answer, except you're not allowed to say that. As with those silly online personality tests, you just have to go with whatever you think usually applies.

Old Post 05-09-13 09:15 #
DoomUK is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
durian
Member


Posts: 497
Registered: 08-08


Indeed. It's a little odd to see a Likert scale being used without a 'Neither agree nor disagree' option, which one could use if the question was poorly posed and so warranted an 'it depends' answer.

Old Post 05-09-13 09:23 #
durian is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
myk
volveré y seré millones


Posts: 15226
Registered: 04-02



geo said:
What are your thoughts on Libertarians?
I prefer librarians.

Old Post 05-14-13 22:27 #
myk is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Email || Homepage || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
Caffeine Freak
black and shiny


Posts: 732
Registered: 05-10


Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.62

Old Post 05-15-13 01:13 #
Caffeine Freak is offline Profile || Blog || PM || Search || Add Buddy IP || Edit/Delete || Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »  
Doomworld Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.5 Doomworld Forums > Misc. > Everything Else > Any thoughts on Libertarians?

Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are OFF
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - Doomworld >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.